Discussion:
gcc 4.8.1 patch
Gerardo Di Iorio
2013-09-12 04:46:32 UTC
Permalink
,
i try to build gcc 4.8.1
In stage 0 build fine, but not in stage 1,
is missing libstdc++.
gcc4.8.1 have need libstdc for build.
Now we can or add an new package libstdc or moifify gcc.conf for build
libstdc
i attach initial patch

Regards
gerardo di iorio
René Rebe
2013-09-12 10:22:24 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Having libstdc++ as single package would also be nice to reduce build time and allow to just rebuild some parts of gcc, … similar for gcj and other parts of the huge GCC packages, … patches welcome ;-)!

Greetings,
René

On Sep 12, 2013, at 6:46 , Gerardo Di Iorio wrote:

> ,
> i try to build gcc 4.8.1
> In stage 0 build fine, but not in stage 1,
> is missing libstdc++.
> gcc4.8.1 have need libstdc for build.
> Now we can or add an new package libstdc or moifify gcc.conf for build
> libstdc
> i attach initial patch
>
> Regards
> gerardo di iorio
>
> <gcc4.8.1.patch>-----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-03 11:22:32 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would benefit to
build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was hard
enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.

Thank you,

Iulian
Gerardo Di Iorio
2013-10-04 12:08:20 UTC
Permalink
hi,
i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
If build fine and boot i share the iso.


2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>

> Hi,
>
> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would benefit to
> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was hard
> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Iulian
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-05 03:32:04 UTC
Permalink
well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0 iso
to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to build
since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my diffs
and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.

Regards,

Iulian


> hi,
> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>
>
> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would benefit
>> to
>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was
>> hard
>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>
>>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-14 09:27:44 UTC
Permalink
Well,

after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that refuse
to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does not
boot. i get Failed to execute /init

/bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)

kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.

i am really dissapointed.



> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0 iso
> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to build
> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my diffs
> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Iulian
>
>
>> hi,
>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would benefit
>>> to
>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was
>>> hard
>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Iulian
>>>
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
René Rebe
2013-10-14 10:03:41 UTC
Permalink
Hi Iulian,

yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to fix it :-/

I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure with an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the kernel and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as necessary for the initrd stuff, …).

Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I personally spent with T2:

http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2

I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes and patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.

Greetings,
René

On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Well,
>
> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that refuse
> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does not
> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>
> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)
>
> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>
> i am really dissapointed.
>
>
>
>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0 iso
>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to build
>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my diffs
>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>> hi,
>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would benefit
>>>> to
>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was
>>>> hard
>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-14 09:56:47 UTC
Permalink
Hi Rene,

i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will write
a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was just
blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but last
days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and over to
get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight....




> Hi Iulian,
>
> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to fix it
> :-/
>
> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure with
> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the kernel
> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>
> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I personally
> spent with T2:
>
> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>
> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes and
> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>
> Greetings,
> René
>
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Well,
>>
>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that refuse
>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does
>> not
>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>
>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)
>>
>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>
>> i am really dissapointed.
>>
>>
>>
>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0
>>> iso
>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>> build
>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>> diffs
>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Iulian
>>>
>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>> benefit
>>>>> to
>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was
>>>>> hard
>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
René Rebe
2013-10-14 10:29:33 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at university I often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build abort to beep and wake me up at night, …

I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise working VM does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be something out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.

Greetings,
René

On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi Rene,
>
> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will write
> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was just
> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but last
> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and over to
> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight....
>
>
>
>
>> Hi Iulian,
>>
>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to fix it
>> :-/
>>
>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure with
>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the kernel
>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>
>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I personally
>> spent with T2:
>>
>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>
>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes and
>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> René
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Well,
>>>
>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that refuse
>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does
>>> not
>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>
>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)
>>>
>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>
>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0
>>>> iso
>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>>> build
>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>>> diffs
>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> hi,
>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It was
>>>>>> hard
>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>
>>
>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478
Managing Director: René Rebe
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-14 10:06:10 UTC
Permalink
Hi Rene,
Which was the last working kernel?

regards,

Iulian


> Hi,
>
> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at university I
> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build abort
> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>
> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise working VM
> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be something
> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>
> Greetings,
> René
>
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>> write
>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>> just
>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>> last
>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and over
>> to
>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>
>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to fix
>>> it
>>> :-/
>>>
>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure
>>> with
>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>> kernel
>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>
>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>> personally
>>> spent with T2:
>>>
>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>
>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes and
>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well,
>>>>
>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>> refuse
>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does
>>>> not
>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>
>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)
>>>>
>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>
>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0
>>>>> iso
>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>>>> build
>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>>>> diffs
>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
> DE251602478
> Managing Director: René Rebe
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-14 12:17:36 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
experiencing

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/

basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.


there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
with this one and try to put it in.

Regards,

Iulian





> Hi,
>
> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at university I
> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build abort
> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>
> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise working VM
> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be something
> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>
> Greetings,
> René
>
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>> write
>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>> just
>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>> last
>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and over
>> to
>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>
>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to fix
>>> it
>>> :-/
>>>
>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure
>>> with
>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>> kernel
>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>
>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>> personally
>>> spent with T2:
>>>
>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>
>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes and
>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well,
>>>>
>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>> refuse
>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does
>>>> not
>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>
>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)
>>>>
>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>
>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0
>>>>> iso
>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>>>> build
>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>>>> diffs
>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
> DE251602478
> Managing Director: René Rebe
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
René Rebe
2013-10-15 08:08:12 UTC
Permalink
Hi Iulian,

thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!

Greetings,
René

On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi,
>
> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
> experiencing
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>
> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>
>
> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
> with this one and try to put it in.
>
> Regards,
>
> Iulian
>
>
>
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at university I
>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build abort
>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>
>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise working VM
>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be something
>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> René
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rene,
>>>
>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>> write
>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>> just
>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>> last
>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and over
>>> to
>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>
>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to fix
>>>> it
>>>> :-/
>>>>
>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure
>>>> with
>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>> kernel
>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>
>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>> personally
>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>
>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>
>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes and
>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> René
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well,
>>>>>
>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>> refuse
>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it does
>>>>> not
>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>
>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or directory)
>>>>>
>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2 8.0
>>>>>> iso
>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but still
>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>>>>> build
>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
>> DE251602478
>> Managing Director: René Rebe
>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>
>>
>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478
Managing Director: René Rebe
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-15 07:47:20 UTC
Permalink
Hi Rene,

I will continue the search because i think that there are also other
packages that break the build. one of them is udev which is ...messy. i
did not find yet a way of fixing it but i will post my patches as soon as
i find a comfortable solution and a reliable reproducible way of
upgrading.

it takes a lot of work but the outcome is near :)

regards,

Iulian



> Hi Iulian,
>
> thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!
>
> Greetings,
> René
>
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
>> experiencing
>>
>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>>
>> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>>
>>
>> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
>> with this one and try to put it in.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at university
>>> I
>>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build
>>> abort
>>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>>
>>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise working
>>> VM
>>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be
>>> something
>>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>
>>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>>> write
>>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>>> just
>>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>>> last
>>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and
>>>> over
>>>> to
>>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight... .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
>>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to
>>>>> fix
>>>>> it
>>>>> :-/
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure
>>>>> with
>>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>>> kernel
>>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>>> personally
>>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>>
>>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes
>>>>> and
>>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> René
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>>> refuse
>>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it
>>>>>> does
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or
>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2
>>>>>>> 8.0
>>>>>>> iso
>>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
>>> DE251602478
>>> Managing Director: René Rebe
>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
> DE251602478
> Managing Director: René Rebe
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
René Rebe
2013-10-15 08:19:55 UTC
Permalink
HI,

yes with new udev versions it is annoying that they use even more state-of-the-art glibc and kernel features, macros, bits, that fail with dietlibc. Not using dietlibc increases the initrd significantly. I just fixed mkinitrd to work with glibc dynamic .so for lib64 systems, …

René

On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:47 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi Rene,
>
> I will continue the search because i think that there are also other
> packages that break the build. one of them is udev which is ...messy. i
> did not find yet a way of fixing it but i will post my patches as soon as
> i find a comfortable solution and a reliable reproducible way of
> upgrading.
>
> it takes a lot of work but the outcome is near :)
>
> regards,
>
> Iulian
>
>
>
>> Hi Iulian,
>>
>> thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!
>>
>> Greetings,
>> René
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
>>> experiencing
>>>
>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>>>
>>> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>>>
>>>
>>> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
>>> with this one and try to put it in.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Iulian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at university
>>>> I
>>>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build
>>>> abort
>>>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>>>
>>>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise working
>>>> VM
>>>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be
>>>> something
>>>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> René
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>>
>>>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>>>> write
>>>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>>>> just
>>>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>>>> last
>>>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and
>>>>> over
>>>>> to
>>>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting tonight....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things are
>>>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> :-/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of failure
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>>>> personally
>>>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>> René
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>>>> refuse
>>>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it
>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or
>>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2
>>>>>>>> 8.0
>>>>>>>> iso
>>>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying to
>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post my
>>>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download. It
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>
>>
>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-15 08:07:16 UTC
Permalink
i'm not even using dietlibc. :)



> HI,
>
> yes with new udev versions it is annoying that they use even more
> state-of-the-art glibc and kernel features, macros, bits, that fail with
> dietlibc. Not using dietlibc increases the initrd significantly. I just
> fixed mkinitrd to work with glibc dynamic .so for lib64 systems, …
>
> René
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:47 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> I will continue the search because i think that there are also other
>> packages that break the build. one of them is udev which is ...messy. i
>> did not find yet a way of fixing it but i will post my patches as soon
>> as
>> i find a comfortable solution and a reliable reproducible way of
>> upgrading.
>>
>> it takes a lot of work but the outcome is near :)
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>
>>> thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
>>>> experiencing
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>>>>
>>>> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
>>>> with this one and try to put it in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at
>>>>> university
>>>>> I
>>>>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build
>>>>> abort
>>>>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>>>>
>>>>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise
>>>>> working
>>>>> VM
>>>>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be
>>>>> something
>>>>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> René
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>>>>> write
>>>>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting
>>>>>> tonight....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to
>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of
>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>> René
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>>>>> refuse
>>>>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or
>>>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2
>>>>>>>>> 8.0
>>>>>>>>> iso
>>>>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download .
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-15 08:15:13 UTC
Permalink
Maybe we should look also to include dracut? it looks like it can handle
better the udev issue?



> HI,
>
> yes with new udev versions it is annoying that they use even more
> state-of-the-art glibc and kernel features, macros, bits, that fail with
> dietlibc. Not using dietlibc increases the initrd significantly. I just
> fixed mkinitrd to work with glibc dynamic .so for lib64 systems, …
>
> René
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:47 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> I will continue the search because i think that there are also other
>> packages that break the build. one of them is udev which is ...messy. i
>> did not find yet a way of fixing it but i will post my patches as soon
>> as
>> i find a comfortable solution and a reliable reproducible way of
>> upgrading.
>>
>> it takes a lot of work but the outcome is near :)
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>
>>> thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
>>>> experiencing
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>>>>
>>>> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
>>>> with this one and try to put it in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at
>>>>> university
>>>>> I
>>>>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build
>>>>> abort
>>>>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>>>>
>>>>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise
>>>>> working
>>>>> VM
>>>>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be
>>>>> something
>>>>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> René
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>>>>> write
>>>>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting
>>>>>> tonight....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to
>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of
>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>> René
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>>>>> refuse
>>>>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or
>>>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2
>>>>>>>>> 8.0
>>>>>>>>> iso
>>>>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download .
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-17 02:04:01 UTC
Permalink
Good news. i managed to compile a minimal x86 and install it successfuly
from a cd. i had to do a downgrade at udev but i will not post yet the
thing untill i try with the current svn udev. i did update first the svn
tree to be sure that i have the latest quirks and changes.

keep you posted,

Iulian


> HI,
>
> yes with new udev versions it is annoying that they use even more
> state-of-the-art glibc and kernel features, macros, bits, that fail with
> dietlibc. Not using dietlibc increases the initrd significantly. I just
> fixed mkinitrd to work with glibc dynamic .so for lib64 systems, …
>
> René
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:47 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> I will continue the search because i think that there are also other
>> packages that break the build. one of them is udev which is ...messy. i
>> did not find yet a way of fixing it but i will post my patches as soon
>> as
>> i find a comfortable solution and a reliable reproducible way of
>> upgrading.
>>
>> it takes a lot of work but the outcome is near :)
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>
>>> thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
>>>> experiencing
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>>>>
>>>> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
>>>> with this one and try to put it in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at
>>>>> university
>>>>> I
>>>>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build
>>>>> abort
>>>>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>>>>
>>>>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise
>>>>> working
>>>>> VM
>>>>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be
>>>>> something
>>>>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> René
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>>>>> write
>>>>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting
>>>>>> tonight....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to
>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of
>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>> René
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>>>>> refuse
>>>>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or
>>>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2
>>>>>>>>> 8.0
>>>>>>>>> iso
>>>>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download .
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-17 11:48:37 UTC
Permalink
Ok,
so after almost 1 day of recompiling the basic minimal i was greeted with
the same issue, cannot boot from install CD, the system cannot find
2nd_stage*tar. i reverted to udev version 136, version that was on my
previous installation, that works and installs corectly and boots the CD.

After i will finish creating a basic workable T2 with current packages and
outdated udev i will try to adapt 167 to our version or if something new
comes up i will try to go to that version.

If you try to replicate my steps beware that util-linux currently on t2
SVN will fail with udev 136. You need to add the following to
pachage/util-linux.conf

var_append GCC_WRAPPER_APPEND ' '
'-DLIBUDEV_I_KNOW_THE_API_IS_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE=1'


also,
if you start as i did from t2 iso 8.0 or rc2 ( rc3 is not there) you need
to :

1. create a config that will closely match your current t2 instalation
(basic desktop)
2. use Emerge-pkg -cfg your_previously_defined_cfg to install m4 autoconf
automake gawk python bc and if you try to build mesa and X add llvm to
this list. These will install some aditional dependencies and hopefully
the deps will also compile successfuly. Now there is a catch here. The
dependencies are tricky ( one tries to install udev... but fails with
167). If the package you need was built successfuly but some other
package, built after your intended one fails, do not try to build the next
one as a separate command to Emerge-pkg. You need a stable compile
environment enough to build a decent and recent t2 and that will be the
build base for the rest.
3. gcc will complain at some point about the exception model. simply
disable this feature adding in .config the --disable-sjlj-eceptions to the
config params
4.DO NOT TRY TO UPDATE UDEV at 167 on your current system. it messed up my
consoles and possibly other stuff. on a T2 installed from disk, it will
still boot but not very nice. I also do not recommend recreating initrd
with this melange of old and new packages. I did it once and it costed me
1 hour of my time in reinstalling and patching again.
5.also in util-linux disable sulogin, su, login using config options
--disable-feature. these are built separately by their respective packages
and build will fail either for util-linux or for these packages because of
shared files.
6.downgrade gawk to 4.0.2. it is better for this build. Later on you can
attempt to upgrade but for now your life will be easier with this one and
gawk is needed.

7. aufs.conf remove var_append_makeopt ' ' ' blabla (obsolete i think)
8. downgrade automake to 1.13.4 ( some packages will require it)
9. dietlibc file parse-config-9 you have some mambo jumbo related to udev
compiling a second time and link against dietlibc. if you do not build
with dietlibc i recommend commenting that branch. it will fail gracefully
if you build with glibc and no dynamic linking to dietlibc

there might be other issues but these are the big ones. The rest you will
figure out by yourself and if not we will try to help.
------------------------------
now try to build and fix issues as they come. I include some patches here
and as i progress i will add more.

good luck,

Iulian




> HI,
>
> yes with new udev versions it is annoying that they use even more
> state-of-the-art glibc and kernel features, macros, bits, that fail with
> dietlibc. Not using dietlibc increases the initrd significantly. I just
> fixed mkinitrd to work with glibc dynamic .so for lib64 systems, …
>
> René
>
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 9:47 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> I will continue the search because i think that there are also other
>> packages that break the build. one of them is udev which is ...messy. i
>> did not find yet a way of fixing it but i will post my patches as soon
>> as
>> i find a comfortable solution and a reliable reproducible way of
>> upgrading.
>>
>> it takes a lot of work but the outcome is near :)
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>
>>> thank you so much! Committed revision 42116!
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>> René
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 14:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After scanning the last 3 hours i think that this is the issue we are
>>>> experiencing
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/kernel-3-10-0-won%27t-run-initrd-slackware-14-0-a-4175468404/
>>>>
>>>> basically we need to enable in 3.10 CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> there are other posts that are around this similar issue but i will go
>>>> with this one and try to put it in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I know this fix-clean-build cycles. When I was still at
>>>>> university
>>>>> I
>>>>> often did so at ROCK/T2 times for a week. Even configured the build
>>>>> abort
>>>>> to beep and wake me up at night, …
>>>>>
>>>>> I just double checked, linux-3.11.x does update in an otherwise
>>>>> working
>>>>> VM
>>>>> does not boot with the same error in my test VM, … There must be
>>>>> something
>>>>> out of sync regarding kernel config and initrd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> René
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:56 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rene,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i collected all the patches i applied over the last week and i will
>>>>>> write
>>>>>> a new doc on how to get up from 8.0 to 9.0 in 83 "easy" steps. I was
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> blowing some steam.... sorry. i know how much work you put in... but
>>>>>> last
>>>>>> days were filled with fix clean -cache -build and restart over and
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> get all right. I was really hoping to see that T2 booting
>>>>>> tonight....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Iulian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes, so am I after over a decade in the open source world. Things
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> broken rather more often than not, and than people can catch up to
>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take a look as well, I noticed I also got this kind of
>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> an in-system kernel update, so it looks something changed with the
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> and/or config (that is maybe some new config option is not set as
>>>>>>> necessary for the initrd stuff, …).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, from the change-log it should be obvious how much work I
>>>>>>> personally
>>>>>>> spent with T2:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.exactcode.de/ChangeLog-t2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would really appreciate if others would contribute their changes
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> patches more often to keep things working more smoothly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>> René
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:27 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> after almost a week of tinkering day and night with packages that
>>>>>>>> refuse
>>>>>>>> to update i managed to compile a basic version. Unfortunately it
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> boot. i get Failed to execute /init
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /bin/sh No Controlling TTY (open /dev/tty: no such file or
>>>>>>>> directory)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kernel is 3.10.12-dist and initrd appears to be correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i am really dissapointed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well i'm trying for the last two days to build a workable from t2
>>>>>>>>> 8.0
>>>>>>>>> iso
>>>>>>>>> to no avail. Downgraded some packages, tweaked some others but
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> cannot build. Thank you for your efforts. i will continue trying
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>> since i have a big project based on this. Of course i will post
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> diffs
>>>>>>>>> and tweaks and possible a new manual if i have time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>>> i now try an build an 64bit live iso on current trunk.
>>>>>>>>>> If build fine and boot i share the iso.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/10/3 <***@ns.pandcinfo.ro>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the current t2 live CD is still at version 8. I think it would
>>>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> build a new CD image starting from 9.0 and put it on download .
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>>> enough to build t2 from it last year, now it became harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Iulian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>>>>>>>>>>> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-17 11:55:13 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

forgot to add patches for video drivers i fixed.

here they are

regards,

Iulian
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-21 08:33:35 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,

managed to make current udev to work and boot from CD and stuff. THere are
two issues that has to be fixed.

No 1:
in package configuration file ( trunk/package/filesystem/udev/udev.conf)
there is the line : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib udev/" #
$libdir?

change the line to be : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib/udev/" #
$libdir? ( aka remove the dam space from between the udev and lib. This
will cause all the udev rules to be written where they should be not in
/lib/rules.d.


No2:

go into downloads, (trunk/download/mirror/u/) unpack the udev-167.tar.bz2
and copy al the rules from /udev/rules/rules.d into package config folder
( from udev-167/rules/rules.d to /trunk/package/filesystem/udev)

this will cause all valid rules of udev to be written into
/etc/udev/rules.d and also into initrd image when this image is built.
Witout these rules the installer cannot find stage 2 because there are no
rules to describe the devices and map corresponding things into /dev
before 2nd stage can be loaded.


there are still some minor messages on the console after 2nd stage loads
but i will fix them ( or at least try to)


now clean all the stuff from cache and build and put your CPU's to rebuild
the distro. It will build and install.

cheers,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-22 12:30:39 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

looks like Gerardo Di Iorio broke that in June, ieek :-/ - he already committed your fix in r42121.

What is wrong with our u/dev rules? As far as I remember the default rules (years ago) where very verbose and created all kinds of random compat stuff and whatnot all over. I would prefer keeping the default rules minimal, lean and clean.

On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:33 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> managed to make current udev to work and boot from CD and stuff. THere are
> two issues that has to be fixed.
>
> No 1:
> in package configuration file ( trunk/package/filesystem/udev/udev.conf)
> there is the line : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib udev/" #
> $libdir?
>
> change the line to be : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib/udev/" #
> $libdir? ( aka remove the dam space from between the udev and lib. This
> will cause all the udev rules to be written where they should be not in
> /lib/rules.d.
>
>
> No2:
>
> go into downloads, (trunk/download/mirror/u/) unpack the udev-167.tar.bz2
> and copy al the rules from /udev/rules/rules.d into package config folder
> ( from udev-167/rules/rules.d to /trunk/package/filesystem/udev)
>
> this will cause all valid rules of udev to be written into
> /etc/udev/rules.d and also into initrd image when this image is built.
> Witout these rules the installer cannot find stage 2 because there are no
> rules to describe the devices and map corresponding things into /dev
> before 2nd stage can be loaded.
>
>
> there are still some minor messages on the console after 2nd stage loads
> but i will fix them ( or at least try to)
>
>
> now clean all the stuff from cache and build and put your CPU's to rebuild
> the distro. It will build and install.
>
> cheers,
>
> Iulian
>
>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478
Managing Director: René Rebe
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-22 20:42:05 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

i would love to keep them at minimum but the new udev loves to have them
in place even in initrd otherwise it will not boot correctly from CD. i
will do further tests to minimize packages but for now that is my
recommendation.

Regards,

Iulian


> Hi,
>
> looks like Gerardo Di Iorio broke that in June, ieek :-/ - he already
> committed your fix in r42121.
>
> What is wrong with our u/dev rules? As far as I remember the default rules
> (years ago) where very verbose and created all kinds of random compat
> stuff and whatnot all over. I would prefer keeping the default rules
> minimal, lean and clean.
>
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:33 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> managed to make current udev to work and boot from CD and stuff. THere
>> are
>> two issues that has to be fixed.
>>
>> No 1:
>> in package configuration file ( trunk/package/filesystem/udev/udev.conf)
>> there is the line : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib udev/" #
>> $libdir?
>>
>> change the line to be : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib/udev/"
>> #
>> $libdir? ( aka remove the dam space from between the udev and lib. This
>> will cause all the udev rules to be written where they should be not in
>> /lib/rules.d.
>>
>>
>> No2:
>>
>> go into downloads, (trunk/download/mirror/u/) unpack the
>> udev-167.tar.bz2
>> and copy al the rules from /udev/rules/rules.d into package config
>> folder
>> ( from udev-167/rules/rules.d to /trunk/package/filesystem/udev)
>>
>> this will cause all valid rules of udev to be written into
>> /etc/udev/rules.d and also into initrd image when this image is built.
>> Witout these rules the installer cannot find stage 2 because there are
>> no
>> rules to describe the devices and map corresponding things into /dev
>> before 2nd stage can be loaded.
>>
>>
>> there are still some minor messages on the console after 2nd stage loads
>> but i will fix them ( or at least try to)
>>
>>
>> now clean all the stuff from cache and build and put your CPU's to
>> rebuild
>> the distro. It will build and install.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
> DE251602478
> Managing Director: René Rebe
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
René Rebe
2013-10-22 21:44:07 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

what exactly changed? Format totally different, or just "some rule" to make some kernel module load or vital device node to appear?

On Oct 22, 2013, at 22:42 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi,
>
> i would love to keep them at minimum but the new udev loves to have them
> in place even in initrd otherwise it will not boot correctly from CD. i
> will do further tests to minimize packages but for now that is my
> recommendation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Iulian
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> looks like Gerardo Di Iorio broke that in June, ieek :-/ - he already
>> committed your fix in r42121.
>>
>> What is wrong with our u/dev rules? As far as I remember the default rules
>> (years ago) where very verbose and created all kinds of random compat
>> stuff and whatnot all over. I would prefer keeping the default rules
>> minimal, lean and clean.
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:33 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> managed to make current udev to work and boot from CD and stuff. THere
>>> are
>>> two issues that has to be fixed.
>>>
>>> No 1:
>>> in package configuration file ( trunk/package/filesystem/udev/udev.conf)
>>> there is the line : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib udev/" #
>>> $libdir?
>>>
>>> change the line to be : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib/udev/"
>>> #
>>> $libdir? ( aka remove the dam space from between the udev and lib. This
>>> will cause all the udev rules to be written where they should be not in
>>> /lib/rules.d.
>>>
>>>
>>> No2:
>>>
>>> go into downloads, (trunk/download/mirror/u/) unpack the
>>> udev-167.tar.bz2
>>> and copy al the rules from /udev/rules/rules.d into package config
>>> folder
>>> ( from udev-167/rules/rules.d to /trunk/package/filesystem/udev)
>>>
>>> this will cause all valid rules of udev to be written into
>>> /etc/udev/rules.d and also into initrd image when this image is built.
>>> Witout these rules the installer cannot find stage 2 because there are
>>> no
>>> rules to describe the devices and map corresponding things into /dev
>>> before 2nd stage can be loaded.
>>>
>>>
>>> there are still some minor messages on the console after 2nd stage loads
>>> but i will fix them ( or at least try to)
>>>
>>>
>>> now clean all the stuff from cache and build and put your CPU's to
>>> rebuild
>>> the distro. It will build and install.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Iulian
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
>> DE251602478
>> Managing Director: René Rebe
>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>
>>
>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478
Managing Director: René Rebe
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-22 21:32:02 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

For one the rules to map cdrom and other devices are not working with just
the inclusion of 10-* ruleset. if you use just that, the CD boot will not
find stage2. with the inclusion of the ruleset from the package the CD
boots correctly.

regards,

Iulian



> Hi,
>
> what exactly changed? Format totally different, or just "some rule" to
> make some kernel module load or vital device node to appear?
>
> On Oct 22, 2013, at 22:42 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i would love to keep them at minimum but the new udev loves to have them
>> in place even in initrd otherwise it will not boot correctly from CD. i
>> will do further tests to minimize packages but for now that is my
>> recommendation.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> looks like Gerardo Di Iorio broke that in June, ieek :-/ - he already
>>> committed your fix in r42121.
>>>
>>> What is wrong with our u/dev rules? As far as I remember the default
>>> rules
>>> (years ago) where very verbose and created all kinds of random compat
>>> stuff and whatnot all over. I would prefer keeping the default rules
>>> minimal, lean and clean.
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:33 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> managed to make current udev to work and boot from CD and stuff. THere
>>>> are
>>>> two issues that has to be fixed.
>>>>
>>>> No 1:
>>>> in package configuration file (
>>>> trunk/package/filesystem/udev/udev.conf)
>>>> there is the line : var_append confopt " " "--libexecdir=/lib udev/" #
>>>> $libdir?
>>>>
>>>> change the line to be : var_append confopt " "
>>>> "--libexecdir=/lib/udev/"
>>>> #
>>>> $libdir? ( aka remove the dam space from between the udev and lib.
>>>> This
>>>> will cause all the udev rules to be written where they should be not
>>>> in
>>>> /lib/rules.d.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No2:
>>>>
>>>> go into downloads, (trunk/download/mirror/u/) unpack the
>>>> udev-167.tar.bz2
>>>> and copy al the rules from /udev/rules/rules.d into package config
>>>> folder
>>>> ( from udev-167/rules/rules.d to /trunk/package/filesystem/udev)
>>>>
>>>> this will cause all valid rules of udev to be written into
>>>> /etc/udev/rules.d and also into initrd image when this image is built.
>>>> Witout these rules the installer cannot find stage 2 because there are
>>>> no
>>>> rules to describe the devices and map corresponding things into /dev
>>>> before 2nd stage can be loaded.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> there are still some minor messages on the console after 2nd stage
>>>> loads
>>>> but i will fix them ( or at least try to)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> now clean all the stuff from cache and build and put your CPU's to
>>>> rebuild
>>>> the distro. It will build and install.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Iulian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>>> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
>>> DE251602478
>>> Managing Director: René Rebe
>>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#:
> DE251602478
> Managing Director: René Rebe
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-23 10:17:45 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

we begin today's patching spree with valgrind. Now this marvellous tool
refuses to compile with the current glibc which unfortunately is at 2.17
and the stubborn valgrind works up to 2.17. attached is a patch to solve
exactly this issue.

Compliments,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-23 13:29:01 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Committed revision 42135.

On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:17 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we begin today's patching spree with valgrind. Now this marvellous tool
> refuses to compile with the current glibc which unfortunately is at 2.17
> and the stubborn valgrind works up to 2.17. attached is a patch to solve
> exactly this issue.
>
> Compliments,
>
> Iulian<glib-2-17-support-fix.patch>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478
Managing Director: René Rebe
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-23 10:21:33 UTC
Permalink
hi,

this tcl version is a little stubborn because it tires to run ranlib on a
shared library ( as far as i remember this is done only on static things
but..who am i to argue). anyway, the attached patch fixes tcl and allows
the dam thing to compile for desktop x86. i am sure you will find mystical
ways to include it in other architectures if required.

Enjoy,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-23 13:07:18 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

hm, still failed for me in stage 0, cross build, … with ran lib on .so, … I now quickly work a rounded that my setting RANLIB=true (the console program returning true, …) for the Makefile, …

Committed revision 42131.

On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:21 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> hi,
>
> this tcl version is a little stubborn because it tires to run ranlib on a
> shared library ( as far as i remember this is done only on static things
> but..who am i to argue). anyway, the attached patch fixes tcl and allows
> the dam thing to compile for desktop x86. i am sure you will find mystical
> ways to include it in other architectures if required.
>
> Enjoy,
>
> Iulian<fix-ranlib-for-so.patch>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-23 12:45:50 UTC
Permalink
i missed one...sorry

this is the diff



> Hi,
>
> hm, still failed for me in stage 0, cross build, … with ran lib on .so, …
> I now quickly work a rounded that my setting RANLIB=true (the console
> program returning true, …) for the Makefile, …
>
> Committed revision 42131.
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:21 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> this tcl version is a little stubborn because it tires to run ranlib on
>> a
>> shared library ( as far as i remember this is done only on static things
>> but..who am i to argue). anyway, the attached patch fixes tcl and allows
>> the dam thing to compile for desktop x86. i am sure you will find
>> mystical
>> ways to include it in other architectures if required.
>>
>> Enjoy,
>>
>> Iulian<fix-ranlib-for-so.patch>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
René Rebe
2013-10-23 13:17:44 UTC
Permalink
No problem, I already committed RANLIB=true to the makeopt, …

On Oct 23, 2013, at 14:45 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> i missed one...sorry
>
> this is the diff
>
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> hm, still failed for me in stage 0, cross build, … with ran lib on .so, …
>> I now quickly work a rounded that my setting RANLIB=true (the console
>> program returning true, …) for the Makefile, …
>>
>> Committed revision 42131.
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:21 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> this tcl version is a little stubborn because it tires to run ranlib on
>>> a
>>> shared library ( as far as i remember this is done only on static things
>>> but..who am i to argue). anyway, the attached patch fixes tcl and allows
>>> the dam thing to compile for desktop x86. i am sure you will find
>>> mystical
>>> ways to include it in other architectures if required.
>>>
>>> Enjoy,
>>>
>>> Iulian<fix-ranlib-for-so.patch>
>>
>> --
>> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
>> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
>> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>>
>>
> <itcl-makefile-fix.diff>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-23 12:54:37 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

This software almost had me.... Ok so we are running a 2.4.x apache server
some fancy APR ( almost latest) and of course the apxs thingie that comes
with them. ok. so the main thing is that subversion does not compile even
if you call a priest!!! stubborn thing! so after scanning for almost two
or three hours for a solution i found it very easy now.
So:

first of all update please subversion to 1.7.13 and change the download
link to point to the new home at apache.
in the package directory, keep the .conf, .cache, .desc and .init and
sasl2-fix.patch. The rest have to be removed or disabled since they are
useless.

now a rule of thumb to figure out easily what goes with what in this piece
of software....
in the root folder of the package ( after you unpack it) you can find a
file called get-deps.sh. inside it you will get the minimal versions of
apache,apr,apxs and the rest of the supporting software needed to be
installed for this subversion to work.

now i will restart the build from 0 just to be sure that all the changes i
did actually compile again without issues.

regards,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-23 13:30:16 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

thanks for all your investigation. If you use a SVN checkout you can send patches easily, just:

svn di some-file some-where …

Then I can apply them directly instead of unpacking, fumbling and reading all the get-deps.sh myself :-/

René

On Oct 23, 2013, at 14:54 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This software almost had me.... Ok so we are running a 2.4.x apache server
> some fancy APR ( almost latest) and of course the apxs thingie that comes
> with them. ok. so the main thing is that subversion does not compile even
> if you call a priest!!! stubborn thing! so after scanning for almost two
> or three hours for a solution i found it very easy now.
> So:
>
> first of all update please subversion to 1.7.13 and change the download
> link to point to the new home at apache.
> in the package directory, keep the .conf, .cache, .desc and .init and
> sasl2-fix.patch. The rest have to be removed or disabled since they are
> useless.
>
> now a rule of thumb to figure out easily what goes with what in this piece
> of software....
> in the root folder of the package ( after you unpack it) you can find a
> file called get-deps.sh. inside it you will get the minimal versions of
> apache,apr,apxs and the rest of the supporting software needed to be
> installed for this subversion to work.
>
> now i will restart the build from 0 just to be sure that all the changes i
> did actually compile again without issues.
>
> regards,
>
> Iulian
>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-23 13:19:29 UTC
Permalink
i wanted to send you a desc file for you to easily include it but last one
sent returned with an spam message and i am a little afraid of sending
that kind of file


regards,

Iulian



> Hi,
>
> thanks for all your investigation. If you use a SVN checkout you can send
> patches easily, just:
>
> svn di some-file some-where …
>
> Then I can apply them directly instead of unpacking, fumbling and reading
> all the get-deps.sh myself :-/
>
> René
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 14:54 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This software almost had me.... Ok so we are running a 2.4.x apache
>> server
>> some fancy APR ( almost latest) and of course the apxs thingie that
>> comes
>> with them. ok. so the main thing is that subversion does not compile
>> even
>> if you call a priest!!! stubborn thing! so after scanning for almost two
>> or three hours for a solution i found it very easy now.
>> So:
>>
>> first of all update please subversion to 1.7.13 and change the download
>> link to point to the new home at apache.
>> in the package directory, keep the .conf, .cache, .desc and .init and
>> sasl2-fix.patch. The rest have to be removed or disabled since they are
>> useless.
>>
>> now a rule of thumb to figure out easily what goes with what in this
>> piece
>> of software....
>> in the root folder of the package ( after you unpack it) you can find a
>> file called get-deps.sh. inside it you will get the minimal versions of
>> apache,apr,apxs and the rest of the supporting software needed to be
>> installed for this subversion to work.
>>
>> now i will restart the build from 0 just to be sure that all the changes
>> i
>> did actually compile again without issues.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com |
> http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
>
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-24 07:18:20 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,

lost half of my night trying to fix the aforementioned packages. There is
simply too much work to be done. Please disable those two if building
kernel. once i'm up with a workable system and have a little more time on
hand i will review and create proper ones for our kernel.

second i have a silly question... every time i run config against my files
it keeps resetting the options i make manually and priorities. I honestly
did not search from where the config it takes the build numbers and
default sage builds for each package. I know it sounds silly but can you
piont me in the right direction?


thank you,

Iulian
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-25 10:44:11 UTC
Permalink
Good evening ladies and gentlemen,

i am sure you did not missed me too much....but here i am with a set of
patches and some advice.

now

No1:
current gcc we are using to build our beloved distro is more strict in
using headers and ...in general is watching much better who includes what
and where.
As a direct consequence, some packages fail to build. the attached patches
for strigi and qt-x11-3.0.8 fix a minor issue by including the stddef.h
into some more stubborn files so the package can safely compile, link
and...be happy.

No:2
there is an issue with several packages including /usr/include/scsi/sg.h (
hal package) that suffers from the same disease explained above. that i
did not fix because i was too lazy to rebuild again the entire mammoth
when i am preparing to build KDE ( yeah i know...me and Sisiphus...)

No:3

gtk+ has an interesting issue and i did not find yet a way of fixing
it...it fails somewhere in the mioddle of compiling and linking stuff
because it cannot find a shered library which it is installed by gtk+
itself. the solution is to go into debug mode, run ldconfig exit from
debug and do the rebuild. i will try on next major rebuild ( after KDE
most probably) to fix it.

No:4

ok now by default we are using jpeglib package. that is broken ( at least
the jmorecfg.h include is messed up). don't be fooled by the fix with
lowcaps and space removed at true and false, it will just delay your next
failure where you have to put back your change. Luckily there is
jpeg-turbo which compiles and installs fine and everybody is happy with
it.


ok.
that's it for now. i'll start KDE which is already at build 4
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-25 10:45:39 UTC
Permalink
forgot to attach the patches....

i'm getting old...
René Rebe
2014-01-28 17:50:20 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

subversion updated to 1.8.5:

http://www.t2-project.org/packages/subversion.html

including new serf dependency:

http://www.t2-project.org/packages/serf.html

Greetings,
René

On Oct 23, 2013, at 15:30 , René Rebe wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks for all your investigation. If you use a SVN checkout you can send patches easily, just:
>
> svn di some-file some-where …
>
> Then I can apply them directly instead of unpacking, fumbling and reading all the get-deps.sh myself :-/
>
> René
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 14:54 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This software almost had me.... Ok so we are running a 2.4.x apache server
>> some fancy APR ( almost latest) and of course the apxs thingie that comes
>> with them. ok. so the main thing is that subversion does not compile even
>> if you call a priest!!! stubborn thing! so after scanning for almost two
>> or three hours for a solution i found it very easy now.
>> So:
>>
>> first of all update please subversion to 1.7.13 and change the download
>> link to point to the new home at apache.
>> in the package directory, keep the .conf, .cache, .desc and .init and
>> sasl2-fix.patch. The rest have to be removed or disabled since they are
>> useless.
>>
>> now a rule of thumb to figure out easily what goes with what in this piece
>> of software....
>> in the root folder of the package ( after you unpack it) you can find a
>> file called get-deps.sh. inside it you will get the minimal versions of
>> apache,apr,apxs and the rest of the supporting software needed to be
>> installed for this subversion to work.
>>
>> now i will restart the build from 0 just to be sure that all the changes i
>> did actually compile again without issues.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Iulian
>>
>
> --
> ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
> http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> ***@t2-project.org with a subject of: unsubscribe t2

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-23 10:26:14 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Since TK is a close brother ( up to the second version identifier) with
TCL, of course a tk of 8.5.x will argue about it's big brother version and
refuse to work with presumed older siblings ( eternal brotherhood friendly
fight). So to fix this issue and allow tk to happily contribute it's libs
and functions to the good of the family, attached is the required desc
file.
i was nice to scan for it so please be nice and add it to the ....well
wherever you want.


Best regards,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-23 13:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Committed revision 42134.

On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:26 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Since TK is a close brother ( up to the second version identifier) with
> TCL, of course a tk of 8.5.x will argue about it's big brother version and
> refuse to work with presumed older siblings ( eternal brotherhood friendly
> fight). So to fix this issue and allow tk to happily contribute it's libs
> and functions to the good of the family, attached is the required desc
> file.
> i was nice to scan for it so please be nice and add it to the ....well
> wherever you want.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Iulian
> <tk.desc>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-22 01:26:11 UTC
Permalink
hi,

a small patch for HAL to compile correctly on current


regards,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-22 13:28:39 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

thanks for all your detective work!

Committed revision 42124.

René

On Oct 22, 2013, at 3:26 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> hi,
>
> a small patch for HAL to compile correctly on current
>
>
> regards,
>
> Iulian
>
> <hal-glib-includefix.patch>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
DE Legal: Amtsgericht Berlin (Charlottenburg) HRB 105123B, Tax-ID#: DE251602478
Managing Director: René Rebe
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-22 21:29:15 UTC
Permalink
hi all,

it was a productive evening.please add the attached package (glu) to the
package list. it has to be built immediately after MESALib.

reason : mesa removed since 9.1.x support for glu inside the standard
library package. because of this several packages fail to build with
missing GL/glu.h includes and associated shared libraries. this package
fixes the issue and allows for inclusion of glu headers and supporting
stuff.

Package builds and install correctly under t2 ( tested with full rebuild)

Regards,

Iulian
René Rebe
2013-10-23 13:21:13 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Committed revision 42133.

On Oct 22, 2013, at 23:29 , ***@ns.pandcinfo.ro wrote:

> hi all,
>
> it was a productive evening.please add the attached package (glu) to the
> package list. it has to be built immediately after MESALib.
>
> reason : mesa removed since 9.1.x support for glu inside the standard
> library package. because of this several packages fail to build with
> missing GL/glu.h includes and associated shared libraries. this package
> fixes the issue and allows for inclusion of glu headers and supporting
> stuff.
>
> Package builds and install correctly under t2 ( tested with full rebuild)
>
> Regards,
>
> Iulian
> <glu-t2-package.tar.gz>

--
ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-22 05:20:09 UTC
Permalink
RFC ( Request for Change)

Hi all,

current mesa package depends on udev being built at stage 5 but in a clean
build mesa tries to build before udev. Moreover, current udev (167)
requires gobject-introspection. i tested the config and mesa will compile
if gobject-introspection and udev are built primary at stage 3. Since i am
still struggling on finding a way of making these changes permanent ( each
time i run config or some other stuff it keeps resetting packages ) please
make udev and gobject-introspection buildable at stage 3 if they are
needed.

thank you,

Iulian
i***@ns.pandcinfo.ro
2013-10-10 08:19:12 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

current 9.0 mine-0.23 package fails to compile correctly due to linking to
non unicode version of ncurses. the attached proposed patch fixes this
issue. it's not the prettiest one but a quick and dirty fix.

regards,

Iulian
Loading...